Euthanasia Opposite Side Essay

euthanasia is a relatively touchy subject and everyone has their own opinion on it. For me, I am pro-euthanasia and I believe that an individuals proper(ip) to autonomy and immunity of choice, euthanasia should be legalized in every(prenominal) the states. It is only fair to give aboutone that right because close is a private matter and should not be controlled by others.If a person autonomously chooses to end his or her life or have someone else assist them in doing so, it should be all(prenominal)owed. One should be gratuitous to do so as languish as no harm is done to others. Moreland goes farther and gives an seam dealing with autonomy stating Since biological life is not the real, moral issue, then life is not in and of itself valuable or sacred simply because it is human life. He goes on saying that the more measurable aspect would be biological life, which deals with autonomy (Moreland). There are many people who are stuck in infirmary beds for months, even years, wired with tubes unable to move from where they lay. They slowly die in a long painful death unable to do any social occasion, while family members clear in agony as their love one withers a course. What an undignified way to die, a slow painful death, too sad to watch. We ordure prevent this if euthanasia was in place. mercy killing can quickly and humanely end a patients paltry allowing them to die with dignity (euthanasia). Not only does this help patients die a more painless death, it as well as can help shorten the grief and suffering or the patients love ones.Illness can imply away the ability to make choices leaving people with no quality of life. Euthanasia allows that person to impart back the control in deciding whether to live or to die (White). A different way to see it is to compare it to our animals. Most people would have their pets put down if they were suffering. It would be unbearable to watch your pet slowly die, rather than having a quick death. Why cant t he same thing happen with humans? It is roughly like animals get a special treatment compared to us. The argument of compassion is when a person is allowed to terminate his or her life in an act of kindness (Moreland). Is it morally faulty to kill someone who is terminally ill? I will give you another scenario to think about. A patient has disseminated cancer, cannot move in his bed for pain, cannot eat because of nausea and has rockyy breathing because of the restrictive do of a large quantity of intra-abdominal fluid (Gillett 62). If the man is begging to be killed, would you not? The argument of tenderness would prove that this is cruel and inhumane. A quiet painless way to die from a fatal shooter is better than being in pain from an affliction, also known as the golden rule (Moreland). immunity of choice is as American as the bald eagle but yet do we all really have that type of freedom? My answer is a big no. Only iii states have euthanasia in place and they are Oregon , Washington, and Montana. But even in these three states it was almost impossible to be give for euthanasia. The requirements that had to be satisfied before a request could be granted were so steep that only 2 people a month used this to end their lives (Pro Euthanasia Arguments). Some of these conditions included patient essential be terminally ill with a life anticipation of less than six months, both doctors must confirm that the patient is capable of making this decision, both doctors must confirm that the patient does not have medical condition that impairs their judgment, and patient must self-administer the lethal medicament (Pro Euthanasia Arguments). Is regulating euthanasia impossible? I must admit it would be very difficult but it is indeed possible. Again take a look at the three states that have euthanasia. animal(prenominal) assisted suicide is usually what would happen to patients in hospitals if they cannot do it on their own. A doctor or nurse would inject the patient with a lethal dose causing them to die or some type of medication (Bourdeau). The terminally ill will get the rights they want and more control of their destiny. Euthanasia promotes the best interests of everyone concerned and violates no ones rights (Moreland).The last thing I wanted to speak about was that euthanasia does free up scarce resources in the hospital (Pro Euthanasia Arguments). Keeping loved ones alive in hospitals uses up a lot of money as well as resources the hospital has to provide. We can direct the equipment to someone else who has a better chance of living rather than a terminally ill patient who will be stuck in the hospital.Euthanasia should be morally accepted and legalized in all states because of the freedom of choice that Americans have. The pain and suffering patients go through coupled with their loved ones eyesight them in a shameful manner can all be stopped if euthanasia is passed. regulation euthanasia should not be too much of a challenge as well since we do have a few states that already have it. The scarce resources that are used to keep the terminally ill barely alive can be used to help aid others live a better lifestyle. In general euthanasia should be looked at as a right we all have considering we are fully autonomous. If one has the right to life does one not have the right to death?Works CitedBourdreau, Donald, MD. Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. The Permanente Journal. N.p., Fall 2011. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. . Euthanasia. Rsrevision. N.p., 2011. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. . Gillett, Grant. Euthanasia, Letting Die and the Pause. JSTOR. N.p., June 1988. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. . Moreland, J. P. Euthanasia Arguments. CRI Euthanasia Arguments Comments. N.p., 17 Apr. 2009. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. . Pro-Euthanasia Arguments. BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. . Smith, Candance. Physician-Assisted Suicide A Topic of Growing Importance. The Society Pages. N.p., 31 July 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. . White, Hilary. British Me dical Journal Campaigns for Legalized Euthanasia. LifeSiteNews. N.p., 18 June 2012. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. .