Critical Analysis of Frustration Essay

The concept of this tosh is that fightfargon can n forever be salutaryified with self-righteousness. That is, if a person is trying to start a war because he thinks himself to be better than his target, there is no only reason for him to do it. Most, if non all, wars be primarily begun by whizz man believing himself to be better than is target. This is turn out through the narration of Rome and other nations. But what makes war justified? Is there ever a reason to destroy a nonher(prenominal)s life history? The coiffe is no. Starting a war can never be justified. This story proves that.In Frustration a man is trying to fall out proof that a justified war is indeed possible. His advanced applied science allows him to run through com postureer simulations which, in theory, would visualise a serial of events that would make this mans war, right. The main issue that is brought up is that a ready reck atomic number 53r, in itself, lacks self-righteousness, meaning that i t places a much higher value on human lives than the average human does. But how does this make whatever deflection? Humans naturally believe that they are in some(a) appearance better than each other.If a man thinks that he is better than a nonher man than what is to stop him from attempting to subdue and enslave the lesser man? It is this self-righteousness, same(predicate) by generations, that causes all wars. All through that ages humanity has stayed the same in their behaviors and characteristics. This story implies this even at the very beginning of it. The whole meal has been prepared by computing machine.Untouched by human hands. With these run-in we know that this story takes place in the future. Herman Gelb, the main protagonist in the story, is at a meeting ith the computer programmer woodpecker Jonsbeck. like a shot the conversation is turned upon the activities of old man Hargrove, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs. Herman is intrigued by the fact that Hargrove is intent on finding a war that is excusable and efficient. At questioning this, Herman get the response from Peter, He wants the domain of a function to be the way we are-noble, h wizst, decent, full of respect for human rights and so on. immediately we know that it is the self-righteousness of Hargrove that is leading him to perform these computer simulations.It shows that, in this authors view, humanity is likely to stay unchanged in the future sottish from their distaste of the other man, self-righteousness driving them to believe that they are the best in the world. And so our characteristic of self-righteousness never changes. Our personal beliefs can never disembarrass war. Self-righteousness makes us blind to the true needs of our fellow man, and in the left everyplace brings dissent among plurality, and war. Peter makes the quote, And theyre keeping the pressure on us, too.They acceptt think were perfect, this shows that self-righteousness never travels one way, tha t is, one person may think he is superior to someone else and that someone else will not think that person superior to him. In the story the three men all believe that they need to castigate the world in order of magnitude to make it like them.They use this to release their reason for war. When Peter says, Hargrove thinks it is possible to find some combine of offset conditions and courses of development that will result in clear victory for us and not too much damage to the world, and he labors in invariable frustration. , we know that Hargrove is so consumed by his self-righteousness that he labors furiously in order to find some kind of equation that will make his war just. This relates to human nature in a way that is explicitly obvious. We do not want to be alone in the world and thence try to make others to be like us. Sadly in this ferment we begin to believe that we are better than our fellow man. This is not so. subsequently all, says Peter, It may be that even th e losing nations would benefit from being tell by us, with our stronger economy and stronger moral mavin.These men in the story are blind. In believing that they view a stronger moral sense datum, they read proven their humanity. What kind of batch, with a strong moral sense, would attempt to take over nations, in order for those nations to be like them. As a people we proneness not to be alone but to be supported. However, through this desire, we get blinded from our true motives. Attempting to assimilate a people is not moral or just. It is scarcely, wrong. As a race we tend to put a much higher value on ourselves and our desires than the needs of our neighbours.Computers have no sense of self-righteousness, which is one of the key components of humanitys character. Herman mentions to Peter that there would be casualties. In reply Peter says, Yes, of course. But the computer will presumably compare the casualties and other damage-to the economy and ecology, for instance-to the benefits that would derive from our have of the world, and if it decides the benefits outweigh the casualties, then it will give the go-ahead for a just war. The computers in the story could not find a grievous enough excuse for a just war because they had no sense of self-righteousness.They did not believe that they demand to be in control of the world and subdue other nations. In response to an accusation from Gelb that Peter is in the computer programming business for the money, Peter defends himself saying, There wont be a war. Theres no realistic combination of events that would make the computer decide on war. The computers put a much higher value on life than Hargrove and the others. Hargrove believed that the other nations needed to be controlled by them in order that they be proper nations. The computers could not justify war by the humans need to be in control.Gelb is curious as to why there will not be a war so Peter tells him, I wear downt know any way of progra mming a computer to give what is most needed in any war, any persecution, any devilry, while ignoring any harm that may be done in the process. Sadly this is true. Any war, in order to be begun, needs some sort of devilry in order for it to get a kickoff. Computers have no sense of devilry because they have no self-righteousness, and, therefore, they can find a reason to start a war for just reasons. Those reasons simply do not exist. Human nature never changes. Wars are wrought. Lives are lost.These wars can never be justified by mans need to be superior to his neighbour. Ever since the dawn of mankind, wars have been fought because one man, or people, believed they were the superior. This characteristic had never changed through our history, and it never will. God gave us the command to love our neighbour as ourselves. However, as this story dictates, people often love themselves way more than their fellow man. Destruction and funny farm have been driven by humanities self-right eousness. But as the story dictates, self-righteousness is never focused one way. People will not freely believe that someone else is better than them.We want others to be like us because we do not want to be alone in the world. unluckily through this process, we begin to believe that we are better than other people. This desire for attention leads to some of the worlds greatest tragedies and depressions. Computers lack what war needs in order to be begun. They lack any sense of devilry and self-righteousness. They place a higher value on life than the average man. Never will they justify war for the sole reason to assimilate another people or nation. No set of equations or circumstances can lead a computer to giving the OK for a just war. It just will not happen.